Temel İlkeleri C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor

Temel İlkeleri C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor

Blog Article

It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?

In this case you don't want to change your class implementation so you don't wantoverride the Equals method. this will define a general way to compare objects in your application.

g. MyType and Object) which will still use the identity comparison. I suspect it's hamiş a great idea to do this unless it's going to be a very heavily used type in your code, where everyone will become very familiar with it and

Birli far as I see this is only exposed through the StructuralComparisons class. The only way I gönül figure out to make this useful is to make a StructuralEqualityComparer helper class as follow:

Birli an example, it might make sense for two different instances of an Employee class to be considered equal if they both represent the same entity in your system.

The following example defines a NanComparer class that implements the IStructuralEquatable interface. It compares two Double or two Single values by using the equality operator. It passes values of any other type to the default equality comparer.

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Ray BooysenRay Booysen C# IStructuralEquatable nedir 29.6k1414 gold badges8686 silver badges111111 bronze badges 6 so when you are dealing with objects, is == assumed to only mean the exact same memory address (same instance)

Task oluşturmanın medarımaişetlemci üzerinde maliyeti vardır ve çok kısaca süren işçiliklemler dâhilin bir task yapılandırmak genel anlamda elan yavaş çalışan uygulamalara neden evet.

To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated birli logically equal, even if they were derece structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow

That is, you kişi create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface katışıksız two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.

There is no need for an equality operator that accepts different types. That should derece even compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works with objects.

Being able to specify IStructuralEquatable/IStructuralComparable in such cases is actually useful. It would also be inconvenient to pass a TupleComparer or ArrayComparer everywhere you want to apply this type of comparison. The two approaches are hamiş mutually exclusive.